Retrieving results for YDL071C, please wait...
Yeast Fitness
Database
Search
Enter orf / gene / drug:
(e.g. pex22 or lovastatin)
YDL071C / IRC1
Section 1: Phenotypes.
Gene-drug relationships for YDL071C
(Hillenmeyer et al., Science 2008)
The top 10 experiments that caused a fitness defect in the YDL071C deletion mutants. On the left is a table listing the top 10 conditions inducing sensitivity; on the right is a visualization of those conditions. Edges may appear more than once if the condition was tested multiple times.
We generally recommend using a significance cutoff of p-value < 0.01. For the "phenotype for all genes" analysis, we used p-value < 1e-5 to control for multiple hypothesis testing. For details, see
The Chemical Genomic Portrait of Yeast
.
.
Heterozygous knockout:
Top 10 sensitivity-inducing conditions for IRC1 Heterozygous deletion:
Condition1
Conc
Unit
FitnessDefect (z-score)
P-value
nocodazole
2
ug/ml
13.1635
0.0000000000016244
thiabendazole
250
uM
9.82066
0.0000000000019107
caspofungin
10
nM
8.1299
0.000000000083179
cantharidin
250
uM
7.98461
0.0076628
cloxyquin
15.6
uM
7.96525
0.00000000014515
wiskostatin
29
uM
6.94814
0.000000035994
cantharidin
250
uM
6.78219
0.010528
bufexamac
1000
uM
6.4284
0.000000030154
itraconazole
8.8
uM
5.99719
0.00000013591
drofenine hydrochloride
750
uM
5.39891
0.0000010791
More
... (click to see all Heterozygous data)
Homozygous knockout:
Top 10 sensitivity-inducing conditions for IRC1 Homozygous deletion:
Condition1
Conc
Unit
FitnessDefect (z-score)
P-value
wiskostatin
29
uM
16.4295
< 1e-12
23 degrees C
10.0764
0.00000074121
rapamycin
6
nM
7.45942
0.0000000058993
thiabendazole
250
uM
7.07959
0.000000080796
sorbitol
1500000
uM
5.60486
0.0000034317
mechlorethamine
62.5
uM
5.14478
0.000011471
mms
0.002
%
5.11391
0.0000061122
rapamycin
4.88
nM
4.94964
0.0000099809
mms
0.002
%
4.89656
0.019634
licl
150
mM
4.81097
0.000015081
More
... (click to see all Homozygous data)
Section 2: Co-fitness interactions.
Gene-gene relationships for YDL071C
(Hillenmeyer et al., Genome Biol. 2010)
This study extends the preliminary analysis of clustering genes according to co-fitness across experiments (Hillenmeyer et al., Science 2008). Here, instead of clustering genes, we analyzed the co-fitness between all pairs of genes, testing several types of correlation.
Heterozygous co-fitness interactions
Top 10 interactors with IRC1 by heterozygous co-sensitivity:
Query
Interactor
CoFitHet
CoFitHom
IRC1
YGR146C
0.50838
-0.01821
IRC1
SWR1
0.45132
0.24633
IRC1
WSC2
0.39962
0.06715
IRC1
EXG1
0.36958
-0.2769
IRC1
SPH1
0.36722
-0.04155
IRC1
SEC72
0.36587
-0.21755
IRC1
PPZ2
0.36281
-0.22378
IRC1
YLR287C
0.35539
0.05715
IRC1
HFD1
0.35264
0.38034
IRC1
YLR279W
0.35215
0.19073
More
... (click to see all interactions)
Complete data download in manuscript supplement
Enriched GO terms of interactors
Process:
None
Function:
None
Component:
None
Homozygous co-fitness interactions
Top 10 interactors with IRC1 by homozygous co-sensitivity:
Query
Interactor
CoFitHet
CoFitHom
IRC1
BDF2
0.1823
0.55129
IRC1
YPR092W
0.09773
0.54801
IRC1
YOR053W
0.00668
0.51235
IRC1
MVP1
0.04545
0.46698
IRC1
SVF1
0.24809
0.46554
IRC1
URA5
0.21949
0.46206
IRC1
YDL057W
0.07926
0.46162
IRC1
YMR31
0.14524
0.44831
IRC1
YLR137W
0.20087
0.44775
IRC1
NDE1
0.15129
0.4427
More
... (click to see all interactions)
Complete data download in manuscript supplement
Enriched GO terms of interactors
Process:
None
Function:
None
Component:
None
External information about YDL071C
Other databases:
Visit YDL071C in [
SGD
|
TheBioGrid
|
BioPixie
]
Previously known GO terms:
Process:
None
Function:
None
Component:
None
Download a
plain text version
of this page.
Pageloads since April 18, 2008
View website stats